What action should be taken if SFRM bond strength tests are extremely difficult to accomplish?

When faced with challenges in conducting bond strength tests for Spray-Applied Fire-Resistive Material (SFRM), exploring alternative approaches is often necessary. Consulting with the building official to see if they will permit other means of verification or compliance is a pragmatic step. This option acknowledges that while bond strength tests are critical for assessing the proper application and effectiveness of fireproofing, there may be instances where logistical or technical difficulties hinder the standard testing protocols.

By engaging with the building official, you open up the possibility for alternative solutions that may still satisfy code requirements without compromising safety or effectiveness. The building official has the authority to approve different methods or approaches that remain within regulatory frameworks, ensuring that the project continues to comply with fire safety standards.

In contrast, skipping the testing altogether would not address the underlying concerns regarding the material's performance, while consulting with an architect may not directly resolve the bond strength verification dilemma. Using a different type of fireproofing material does not necessarily solve the issue at hand and could introduce new complications, including changes to project specifications or additional testing requirements. Therefore, obtaining approval for alternative methods from the building official is the most responsible and effective action.